Antivirus Performance Comparison

When choosing an antivirus program it is crucial to understand the amount of your computer’s resources this program will use. The most effective programs will have a minimal impact on performance of your system, while still providing excellent protection against malware and viruses.

The most reputable antivirus software companies have extensive test software that is widely published in downloadable PDF format. The reports give a quick overview of the protection as well as the performance and usability of each suite. They also provide detailed graphs and charts which show the results of a few testing elements. The percentage of real-world malware and references set exposures that the program blocks, neutralizes or compromises, as well as the number of false positives detections of malicious programs, are crucial figures to keep an eye out for.

In the tests conducted by AV-Comparatives in June 2023, Avast Free Antivirus for Mac was the most successful in achieving the highest pass rates for http://www.avastantivirusreview.com/avast-won-t-open-on-windows-10 blocking Mac malware and PUAs (potentially unwanted applications) and the second highest score for Windows virus detection. It also scored high in the categories of passive, full-scan, and quick-scan.

Bitdefender Total Security was the most minimally intrusive paid software, followed by Kaspersky Total Security, and ESET Security Cloud Free. It was the slowest in both quick-scans as well as full-scans. The program’s relatively light background impact could be due to the fact that the program doesn’t run by default on Windows 10 and 11, like the majority of its competitors do.

Intego had the lowest system impact for background scans and full scans but it still managed to detect every piece of malware. It’s not often that you find a company which solely focuses on Macs. This makes it an excellent option for any security arsenal.